| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
switch from Alpha to Beta for 1.3.1 release.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
addresses.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
So in the case of a CNAME it could potentially return FAIL. Rather let Unbound do the resolving. Bump version number.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
build options.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
servers in the DHCP config if they wish to keep existing behaviour while using Unbound over DNSMasq.
|