aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/.spell-dict
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Clean up some docs formatting.Waylan Limberg2017-09-181-0/+1
|
* Cleaned up spelling (again).Waylan Limberg2015-02-181-1/+2
|
* Added some words missing from Travis' aspell dict.Waylan Limberg2015-02-071-0/+5
|
* Add Docs spellchecking Test.Waylan Limberg2015-02-071-0/+118
Not sure this is the best way to go, but it works. I'm not crazy about running the spellcheck against the built docs, but aspell has a builtin option to easily ignore everything in `<code>` tags which greatly simplfies things. I looked at Doug Hellmans' sphinxcontrib-spelling package which does something similar for Sphinx. However, as Sphinx uses rST and the rST parser outputs a parse tree, Doug is essentially taking that parse tree and running the spellcheck on the appropriate parts (skipping code, etc.). He did a nice [writeup][5] of his development process if you are interested. As Python-Markdown's parse tree is represented as HTML (through ElementTree) I would have to use HTML anyway. And [PyEnchant][2] doesn't currently have good support for HTML. So I used [aspell][3], with inspiration from the [git-spell-check][4] hook. [1]: http://sphinxcontrib-spelling.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html [2]: https://pythonhosted.org/pyenchant/ [3]: http://aspell.net/ [4]: https://github.com/mprpic/git-spell-check [5]: http://doughellmann.com/2011/05/26/creating-a-spelling-checker-for-restructuredtext-documents.html